Wednesday, September 14, 2005

What transparency is required from Syria's past?

Yesterday GW Bush Said that Syria is not cooperating, he mentioned this particular phrase "Syria is not transparent in what it DID in Lebanon"

Most of the Lebanese news papers and the TV news miss-translated that phrase, and they linked it to Bush is bashing Syria for the Syrian intelligence that is still in Lebanon...

Well if the was the case, then in my humble opinion, the phrase would have been said in this way: "Syria is not transparent in what it is Doing in Lebanon"

Now going back to the original phrase, first : It is clear Bush is referring to something that Syria DID in Lebanon and cooperation is being asked from her on TRANSPARENCY on what she DID what could it be?

Now linking both words transparency and DID lead to a conclusion that USA already believes that Syria assassinated Martyr Hariri, and USA are asking Syria to be transparent on this issue.

In what other issues is serious transparency required in something it DID???? And not is still doing?

3 Comments:

At September 14, 2005 5:25 PM, Blogger Charles Malik said...

The title is a bit hard to understand.

 
At September 14, 2005 6:45 PM, Blogger Vox Populi - Agent Provocateur said...

Khaled,

whatever the media said, the guy said 'did'. You can even listen to his speech on voice of America, there's a link on my blog.


http://www.voanews.com/english/2005-09-13-voa41.cfm

 
At September 14, 2005 8:33 PM, Blogger khaled said...

LP thanks, changed it...
Vox thx for the link

 

Post a Comment

<< Home